By: William Smythe
The beautiful part of March lies in the chaos. We may think we know how the chips will fall, and we may count certain teams out of the Big Dance. Yet, even the likes of Georgetown, Louisville and Cal – a combined six conference wins across the three – have a chance to punch their ticket.
Conference tournaments offer a last resort for those who have no window of opportunity for an at-large bid. Stocks can rise and fall in the “postseason before the postseason” tournament, yet the biggest winners are often those with nothing to lose. String together three or four wins and you can find yourself on the board come Selection Sunday.
Coincidentally, the Hoyas are no strangers to this scenario. In 2021-22, the eighth-seeded Hoyas (7-9 Big East) won four consecutive games and secured a no. 12 seed in March Madness. They pulled off the impossible, defeating no. 1 ranked Villanova and second-ranked Creighton (by 25) in the Big East championship.
Last year, seventh-seeded Virginia Tech (11-9 ACC) hit their stride at the right time and upended a top-ranked Duke in the championship.
Now, it’s incredibly unlikely that this year’s Hoyas (and the Hokies) have the chops to pull off such a run. However, who does?
Let’s examine some of this year’s most compelling candidates to make an unexpected run in their conference tournament – including teams on the wrong side of the tournament bubble and those who won’t sniff an at-large bid.
Villanova (15-14, 9-9 Big East):
The Wildcats haven’t exactly continued from where Jay Wright left off. Injuries to star freshman Cam Whitmore (12.3 ppg, 5.1 rpg) and senior guard Justin Moore (12.2 ppg) immediately set Villanova back, while Coach Kyle Neptune couldn’t quite adjust well enough with personnel that wouldn’t exactly stack up to the ‘Nova teams of the past.
However, the Wildcats have dug themselves out of a deep hole – one which included three losing streaks of at least three games – and now look the part of a team ready to fight for the Big East title.
This starting five makes a case for one of the best in the nation. Sure, a full-strength roster with Moore and Whitmore has still lost three games, yet they’re heading in the right direction. Moore has gradually picked up his production after recovering from an Achilles tear – having not looked fully healthy upon his return – and the Wildcats have benefited immensely.
The guard from Maryland exploded for 25 points in Villanova’s signature win of the season – a road victory over then-no. 13 Xavier. Later last week, the ‘Cats delivered no. 19 Creighton its second consecutive loss – by 12, no less – and have now won five of their last six. Talk about hitting your stride at the right time.
It would be wrong not to address the play of junior forward Eric Dixon. The low-post bruiser went for 31 against Creighton and currently leads the Wildcats with 15.9 ppg. With Moore and Final Four starter Caleb Daniels anchoring the backcourt, Dixon, Whitmore and senior forward Brandon Slater provide a more than serviceable group of forwards.
The Big East is brutal, yet the Wildcats have the momentum to carry them to a conference title – their only hope to reach March Madness.
North Carolina (18-11, 10-8 ACC):
The Tar Heels are firmly on the wrong side of the bubble. However, with their first Quad-1 win under their belt – a 71-63 win over no. 6 Virginia – Coach Hubert Davis can breathe a little easier knowing that his team finally has a signature win.
The worst case scenario looms: the Cavaliers may free fall and the win could prove to be less valuable come Selection Sunday – unless North Carolina steals the ACC Tournament title away.
I fear relying on Carolina’s postseason success in 2022, yet I can’t help but think about this team’s ceiling. Four out of the five players from last year’s National Championship (appearance) team have returned – save for Brady Manek, whose departure hurt the Tar Heels more than expected.
However, Northwestern transfer forward Pete Nance just quieted the naysayers with a 22-point explosion against Virginia and could pick up the slack even further in March.
This team may benefit from Greensboro’s neutral (?) site considering their trouble on the road (3-6) and their success at home (7-2). Plenty of Tar Heel faithful will flock to the ACC Tournament and try to spur their team onto a March Madness bid – even if a semifinal/final appearance in the conference tournament will likely give them an at-large look.
The combination of proven veterans – juniors R.J. Davis and Caleb Love, alongside ACC Player of the Year candidate and senior Armando Bacot – and “glue guys” – Nance and senior forward Leaky Black – may lead this team to a surprise ACC title.
Will it be that much of a surprise? Probably not, yet this team certainly hasn’t lived up to expectations.
Michigan (17-12, 11-7 Big Ten):
Another Juwan Howard year, another nail-biting end to conference play. Michigan squeaked into March Madness last year as an at-large despite an 11-9 record in the Big Ten – good for seventh in the conference. This year, the Wolverines might not be so fortunate if they don’t win the Big Ten tournament.
A 25-point loss to Arizona State, two-point defeat to Central Michigan and a 22-point blowout at the hands of Penn State may nip this team in the bud…coupled with the fact that they haven’t won a ranked game all season (even if they’re tied for second in the conference).
However, a team with Hunter Dickinson in the frontcourt (17.4 ppg, 8.6 rpg) always has a chance at the Big Dance. Last year, the big man from Maryland propelled the Wolverines to a Sweet Sixteen appearance amidst the controversy of their at-large bid. A similar mindset could take hold in 2023.
The Michigan of last season managed to lose in the first round of the Big Ten tournament and still heard their name called on Selection Sunday. This year will require a greater effort. Dickinson and guards Jett Howard (14.4 ppg) and Kobe Bufkin (12.9 ppg) have the potential to solidify an automatic bid in a highly-contested Big Ten.
With Michigan’s spot among the top-five in the conference, it may only take three games to reach the Big Dance.
Others up for consideration include:
Oregon (16-13, 10-8 Pac-12): The Ducks certainly haven’t lived up to their preseason expectations, yet they trounced then-no. 9 Arizona and narrowly lost to then-no. 7 UCLA at home. Yes, they’ve lost three out of their last four, but a veteran lineup featuring a stud in senior center N’Faly Dante (13.6 ppg, 8.1 rpg) – could make a run in the Pac-12 tournament. Take Arizona and UCLA out of the equation and the conference is essentially wide open.
Saint Louis (19-10, 11-5 Atlantic 10): VCU currently sits comfortably at the top of the A-10 (13-3), yet the Billikens have the talent to make some waves in the conference tournament. There are some glaring losses on their record – at UMass and Iona and at home against SIU Edwardsville (epitome of brutality level) – but they also have one of the most capable point guards in the nation in junior Yuri Collins (11.3 ppg, 10.2 apg). Give me the Billikens to surprise some folks and punch their ticket for the Big Dance.
*the SEC and Big 12 have too many tournament “locks” for me to consider a team on the wrong side of the bubble/far from an at-large bid. Maybe Mississippi State, West Virginia and Oklahoma State appear to be candidates, but I think they’re on the right side of the bubble and won’t have much of a chance in their respective conference tournaments.
*It’s really hard for me to imagine anyone winning the AAC and WCC outside of Houston and some combination of Gonzaga and Saint Mary’s.
*The Mountain West has two schools most likely receiving a bid regardless of the conference tournament – San Diego State and Boise State. Despite sitting on the bubble, New Mexico has lost six of their last seven and doesn’t look poised to win the Mountain West.