By: George Ahearn
As conference tournament season kicks off, the notorious “bubble watch” intensifies. What makes bubble watch so intriguing is the mixed bag of teams that rest in this uneasy position. We have teams like North Carolina – who are threatening to become the first preseason no. 1 ranked team to not make the tournament. Boise State, Utah State, San Diego State, Nevada and New Mexico have the potential to make the Mountain West a five-bid league.
Charleston – who, despite holding a 28-3 record and finding themselves in the top-25 earlier this season – is in a position to not make the tournament barring a CAA tournament win. Michigan and the ever-polarizing Hunter Dickinson – who saved his team’s tournament chances with a game-tying hoist from three – sit slightly amongst the “outside looking in” crew.
All of this is just a glimpse into what bubble watch will hold during this time of the year. To truly show you all the angles, I’m going to be detailing each team and whether or not we will see them play in the Big Dance in a few weeks.
*Bubble teams based upon ESPN insider John Gasaway’s “Bubble Watch 2023: Brace yourself for NCAA tournament drama” article as well as Joe Lunardi’s bracketology*
At the moment, Gasaway has the bubble consisting of 32 teams for 21 available slots. I’ll detail each conference’s teams and whether or not I see them making the tournament.
IN: NC State, Pitt, UNC, WVU, Providence, NW, MSU, Illinois, Iowa, Rutgers, Michigan, USC, ASU, Texas A&M, Arkansas, Mizzou, Auburn, Miss St, Memphis, Boise St, Florida Atlantic, Oral Roberts (aq), Charleston (aq)
OUT: Clemson, Oklahoma St., Texas Tech, Wisconsin, Penn St., Oregon, Nevada, Utah St., North Texas
ACC: NC State, Pitt, UNC, Clemson
True bubble teams: UNC, Clemson
North Carolina Tar Heels
Yes. I refuse to believe that this team rolls over. Step one was beating UVA at home – which they did in dominant fashion. Now, the Tar Heels have some momentum and should build more from their win against Florida State before a rematch in Cameron Indoor against Duke.
If the Tar Heels win in Cameron on Saturday, that should be all that’s needed to move the needle. A revenge-seeking, motivated UNC team will get the job done.
Clemson Tigers
No. Despite starting conference play 7-0 and compiling a 21-8 record, the Tigers resume is weak, and Brad Brownell’s squad has been fading. They lost games to Boston College (14-15, 8-10 ACC) and Louisville (4-25, 2-16 ACC), and own a weak non-conference schedule that includes losses to South Carolina (10-19, 3-13 SEC) and Loyola Chicago (9-19, 3-13 MVC).
However, they have a matchup on the road at no. 13 Virginia later tonight, and a win could see them enter the field of 68.
Big 12: Oklahoma St., West Virginia, Texas Tech
True bubble teams in my mind: All three
Oklahoma State Cowboys
No. Oklahoma State had a golden opportunity to cement themselves in the field of 68 when shorthanded Baylor traveled to the ‘Pokes on Monday night without star freshman guard Keyonte George. Yet, the Cowboys squandered this opportunity and now sit amongst Lunardi’s “last four out.” Losers of five straight, it seems as if the ’Pokes have played themselves out of tournament position.
The Big 12 is good, but not good enough where a 16-14 record gets you into the tournament.
West Virginia Mountaineers
Yes. The Big 12 rates so well that they have more than enough quality wins to be seen as an NCAA tournament-worthy team. Their win at Iowa State last night should carry Bob Huggins’ squad into the NCAA tournament.
Texas Tech Red Raiders
No. Despite their late season turnaround – including wins over highly-ranked Kansas State and Texas – it’s too little too late for the Red Raiders. Owning an 0-8 conference record is nearly impossible to bounce-back from, but Mark Adams’ crew has put forth a valiant effort to turn their season around.
They look like a team worthy of playing in the tournament, but it isn’t about how you enter the tournament. It’s a season-long quest, and Texas Tech did not play the part all season.
Big East: Providence
True bubble teams in my mind: None
Big Ten: Northwestern, Michigan State, Illinois, Iowa, Rutgers, Wisconsin, Michigan, Penn State
True bubble teams in my mind: Wisconsin, Michigan, Penn St.
Wisconsin Badgers
No. Wisconsin suffered heartbreak as they dropped a road game to the Wolverines thanks to a Hunter Dickinson three-ball to send the game to OT; now, they find themselves in an even more precarious position.
I don’t see the Badgers making a run in the Big Ten tournament, and, barring a home win against Purdue, I imagine that the Badgers will be on the outside looking in come Selection Sunday.
Michigan Wolverines
Yes. As mentioned above, the Wolverines saved their postseason dreams with a miraculous Dickinson three-ball. However, they still remain on the outside of bracket predictions. Michigan has the talent to make a run, and Juwan Howard has a history of willing his teams to better play in March. They have the opportunities in front of them, with two road games at Illinois and Indiana to close the season.
I imagine they win at least one of these games and another game in the Big Ten tournament to solidify their position in the field of 68.
Penn State Nittany Lions
No. Penn State suffered a backbreaking collapse against Rutgers Sunday night, in which they surrendered a 17-point comeback to the Scarlet Knights. Penn State has been remarkable this year under prominent play from star point guard Jalen Pickett, yet I do not think it’s enough.
They finish the season at Northwestern and at home against No. 21 Maryland. They most likely need both these games to see themselves in the tournament field, and that’s a tall task…
Pac-12: USC, Arizona State, Oregon
True bubble teams in my mind: USC, Arizona State, Oregon
USC Trojans
Yes. Andy Enfield’s team has won four in a row and sit in a favorable bubble position. They finish the regular season with two at-home matchups against Arizona and Arizona State. The regular-season finale could tip the scales between USC and ASU to see who sneaks into the tournament, but I expect USC – even if they lose their next two – to save their season in the Pac-12 tournament.
This USC squad has tournament experience, and I expect to see them back in the tournament for a second consecutive year.
Arizona State Sun Devils
Yes. Arizona State celebrated one of the most miraculous shots of the year against No. 7 Arizona when Desmond Cambridge Jr. struck nothing but net from behind half court. Coach Bobby Hurley’s reaction to that shot will tell you everything about how big of a shot that was for this team. A road win against a top-10 opponent saw the Sun Devils’ tournament odds skyrocket.
They have a looming test against no. 4 UCLA before finishing the season at USC. Either of these wins would see the Sun Devils into the field, and I think they have the momentum to carry them into March.
Oregon Ducks
No. Normally I trust Dana Altman in March, and, while a Ducks run in the Pac-12 tournament wouldn’t surprise me, I think they sit too far behind the pack. They have a 16-13 record and failed to win any of their non-conference Quad-1 opportunities – falling to Houston, UConn and Michigan State.
Losing three of their last four, I think it’s fair to rule the Ducks out of this year’s tournament.
SEC: A&M, Arkansas, Mizzou, Auburn, Mississippi State
True bubble teams in my mind: Mizzou, Auburn, Mississippi State
Missouri Tigers
Yes. The front-half of the Tigers’ season looks like a sure-fire tournament resume. They destroyed no. 16 Illinois, 93-71, then – in the following game – beat up on no. 19 Kentucky, 89-75. They beat No. 12 Iowa State, 78-61, and then no. 6 Tennessee in a thriller, 86-85. Surely, this resume garners a NCAA tournament bid.
However, only Tennessee and Kentucky are still ranked amongst those four teams, and Missouri has looked shaky compared to their early season triumphs. The Tigers still look the part of a tournament team, and currently sit as a no. 10 seed in Lunardi’s latest bracket.
As long as they close out the season against LSU and Ole Miss, the Tigers should see their first tournament berth since 2020.
Auburn Tigers
Yes. The Tigers have been fading over the last month and look like one of the weaker tournament teams in the projected field. Yet, your season-long body of work is what’s judged – not how you enter the tournament – and Bruce Pearl’s Tigers will see themselves in the tournament.
A win in either of their final two games against no. 2 Alabama or no. 12 Tennessee would solidify their candidacy.
Mississippi State
Yes. Mississippi State sits amongst the “last four in” of Lunardi’s latest bracket prediction – jumping into the field with a grind-it-out home win against no. 25 Texas A&M. They’ve been the losers of five straight – and then the winners of five straight – but head coach Chris Jans has done enough in his first year to lead the Bulldogs to the NCAA tournament.
Up next for the Bulldogs? Take care of business against lowly South Carolina and Vanderbilt to close out your season.
Mid-Majors: Memphis, Boise State, Nevada, Utah State, Florida Atlantic, Oral Roberts, Charleston, North Texas
True bubble teams in my mind: Memphis, Boise St., Nevada, Utah St., Oral Roberts, Charleston, North Texas
Memphis
Yes. Thankfully for Memphis, the AAC tournament shouldn’t challenge them significantly until they presumably face Houston in the championship. While I don’t fully trust Penny Hardaway, the Tigers should take care of business in the AAC tournament and sneak into the field of 68.
Boise State
Yes. Boise State has one of their biggest games of the season tonight against no. 18 San Diego St., and a win would likely lock in their bid for the NCAA tournament. Even with a loss, I believe the Broncos will be playing in the tournament.
The Mountain West has a load of high-quality teams, and this league should certainly have two representatives in the tournament – with Boise State and SDSU making the cut.
Nevada
No. Nevada suffered a horrendous loss Monday night when they visited Wyoming (9-20, 4-13 MW). This loss severely hurts their tournament odds, and, barring a Mountain West championship, I don’t expect to see the Wolfpack in the tournament.
Utah State
No. Similarly to Nevada, they would most likely need to win the conference tournament in order to receive a bid to the NCAA tournament. They’ve lost both matchups against SDSU, split with Nevada and are 0-1 against Boise State at the moment.
While the Aggies have some solid out-of-conference wins, the fourth-best team in the Mountain West is going to have trouble justifying their spot in the tournament.
Florida Atlantic Owls
Yes. I believe FAU will win the C-USA tournament and earn an automatic qualifier bid; yet, even if the Owls lose to a team like North Texas in the tournament, their resume could keep them in the field of 68. 26-3 is an impressive record regardless of what conference you play in, and this record should see the Owls into the tournament.
Oral Roberts Golden Eagles
Yes. Owning a 18-0 conference record, it feels near impossible that the Golden Eagles do not win the Summit League tournament and receive the AQ bid for the conference. However, if Max Abmas and the Eagles lost in the tournament, I fear they would be left on the outside looking in come Selection Sunday.
College of Charleston Cougars
Yes. College of Charleston had a tremendous start to their season – earning them a top-25 ranking during the early part of the season. However, a couple of stumbles throughout the end of the season has the Cougars in a precarious position. They will most likely need to win the CAA to make the tournament.
Thankfully for Cougars fans, I expect this to become a reality in the coming weeks.
North Texas Mean Green
No. A road loss to Charlotte essentially took the Mean Green off the bubble and eliminated their tournament hopes. However, they are more than capable of winning the C-USA tournament and earning an AQ bid.